{{Shortcut|WP:WATCHMOJO}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[WatchMojo]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Argentina - NO symbol.svg|20px|Generally unreliable|link=]] Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is [[WP:QUESTIONABLE|questionable]] in most cases.
}}
WatchMojo is a site that publishes Internet videos consisting of ranking [[listicle]]s. The site is considered generally unreliable due to poor fact checking and editorial oversight, and for failing to disclose its methodology.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 294#WatchMojo]]
* [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 16#I would like to know your opinion on these sites.]]
* [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 17#WatchMojo.com]]
* [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 17#Unreliable]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:WatchMojo, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="WatchMojo"
| [[WatchMojo]] {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:WATCHMOJO}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 294#WatchMojo|1]]
[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 16#I would like to know your opinion on these sites.|A]] [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 17#WatchMojo.com|B]] [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 17#Unreliable|C]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2020|stale=n}}
| WatchMojo is a site that publishes Internet videos consisting of ranking [[listicle]]s. The site is considered generally unreliable due to poor fact checking and editorial oversight, and for failing to disclose its methodology.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|watchmojo.com}}
|}