{{Shortcut|WP:RSPWIKILEAKS}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[WikiLeaks]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Argentina - NO symbol.svg|20px|Generally unreliable|link=]] Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is [[WP:QUESTIONABLE|questionable]] in most cases.
}}
WikiLeaks is a repository of [[WP:PRIMARY|primary source]] documents [[News leak|leaked]] by [[anonymous sources]]. No consensus exists on its reliability. Some editors questioned the applicability of reliability ratings to Wikileaks. Some editors believe that documents from WikiLeaks fail the [[WP:V|verifiability policy]], because WikiLeaks does not adequately authenticate them, and there are concerns regarding whether the documents are genuine or tampered. It may be appropriate to cite a document from WikiLeaks as a [[WP:PRIMARY|primary source]], but only if it is discussed by a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. However, linking to material that violates copyright is prohibited by [[WP:COPYLINK]].
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:WikiLeaks, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="WikiLeaks"
| {{anchor|Wikileaks}} [[WikiLeaks]] {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:RSPWIKILEAKS}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| {{rsnl|348|RfC: WikiLeaks|2021|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2024}}
| WikiLeaks is a repository of [[WP:PRIMARY|primary source]] documents [[News leak|leaked]] by [[anonymous sources]]. No consensus exists on its reliability. Some editors questioned the applicability of reliability ratings to Wikileaks. Some editors believe that documents from WikiLeaks fail the [[WP:V|verifiability policy]], because WikiLeaks does not adequately authenticate them, and there are concerns regarding whether the documents are genuine or tampered. It may be appropriate to cite a document from WikiLeaks as a [[WP:PRIMARY|primary source]], but only if it is discussed by a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. However, linking to material that violates copyright is prohibited by [[WP:COPYLINK]].
| {{WP:RSPUSES|wikileaks.org}}
|}