<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

    {{Shortcut|WP:RSPWIKINEWS}}
<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''Wikinews''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[Wikinews]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Argentina - NO symbol.svg|20px|Generally unreliable|link=]] Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is [[WP:QUESTIONABLE|questionable]] in most cases.
}}

Most editors believe that Wikinews articles do not meet Wikipedia's [[WP:V|verifiability standards]]. As Wikinews does not enforce a strong editorial policy, many editors consider the site equivalent to a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]], which is generally unreliable.

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 3#Wikinews]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 4#Wikinews redux]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 5#Wikinews: Please post definite answer]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 20#Wikinews being used as a source for UFO sightings]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 27#Wikinews]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 40#Wikinews as a reference]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 125#Wikinews]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 126#Wikinews is reliable.]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 424#Wikimedia Foundation projects]]

* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:Wikinews, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="Wikinews"
| [[Wikinews]] {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:RSPWIKINEWS}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 3#Wikinews|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 4#Wikinews redux|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 5#Wikinews: Please post definite answer|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 20#Wikinews being used as a source for UFO sightings|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 27#Wikinews|5]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 40#Wikinews as a reference|6]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 125#Wikinews|7]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 126#Wikinews is reliable.|8]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 424#Wikimedia Foundation projects|9]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2024|stale=n}}
| Most editors believe that Wikinews articles do not meet Wikipedia's [[WP:V|verifiability standards]]. As Wikinews does not enforce a strong editorial policy, many editors consider the site equivalent to a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]], which is generally unreliable.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|wikinews.org}}
|}