{{Shortcut|WP:RSPWP}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[Wikipedia]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label1 = other names
| data1 = including The Signpost
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Argentina - NO symbol.svg|20px|Generally unreliable|link=]] Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is [[WP:QUESTIONABLE|questionable]] in most cases.
}}
[[WP:WINARS|Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source]] because [[WP:UGC|open wiki]]s are [[WP:SPS|self-published sources]]. This includes articles, non-article pages, ''[[The Signpost]]'', non-English Wikipedias, [[WP:Books|Wikipedia Books]], and [[WP:MIRROR|Wikipedia mirrors]]; see [[WP:CIRCULAR]] for guidance.[{{cite web|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/long_reads/wikipedia-explained-what-is-it-trustworthy-how-work-wikimedia-2030-a8213446.html|title=Can we trust Wikipedia? 1.4 billion people can't be wrong|date=February 19, 2018|website=The Independent|accessdate=February 22, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190211185638/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/long_reads/wikipedia-explained-what-is-it-trustworthy-how-work-wikimedia-2030-a8213446.html|archive-date=February 11, 2019|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}] Occasionally, inexperienced editors may unintentionally cite the Wikipedia article about a publication instead of the publication itself; in these cases, fix the citation instead of removing it. Although citing Wikipedia as a source is against policy, content can be copied between articles with proper attribution; see [[WP:COPYWITHIN]] for instructions.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Wikipedia, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="Wikipedia"
| [[Wikipedia]] (including ''[[The Signpost]]'') {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:RSPWP}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| 22{{efn|See these discussions of WP:
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2024}}
| [[WP:WINARS|Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source]] because [[WP:UGC|open wiki]]s are [[WP:SPS|self-published sources]]. This includes articles, non-article pages, ''[[The Signpost]]'', non-English Wikipedias, [[WP:Books|Wikipedia Books]], and [[WP:MIRROR|Wikipedia mirrors]]; see [[WP:CIRCULAR]] for guidance.[{{cite web|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/long_reads/wikipedia-explained-what-is-it-trustworthy-how-work-wikimedia-2030-a8213446.html|title=Can we trust Wikipedia? 1.4 billion people can't be wrong|date=February 19, 2018|website=The Independent|accessdate=February 22, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190211185638/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/long_reads/wikipedia-explained-what-is-it-trustworthy-how-work-wikimedia-2030-a8213446.html|archive-date=February 11, 2019|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}] Occasionally, inexperienced editors may unintentionally cite the Wikipedia article about a publication instead of the publication itself; in these cases, fix the citation instead of removing it. Although citing Wikipedia as a source is against policy, content can be copied between articles with proper attribution; see [[WP:COPYWITHIN]] for instructions.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|wikipedia.org}}
|}