<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''Wired (magazine)''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[Wired (magazine)]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label1           = other names
| data1            = Wired UK
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}

''Wired'' magazine is considered generally reliable for science and technology.

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 3#leaked documents?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 79#Wired.com]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 103#wired.com and whosnews.usaweekend.com]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 109#Wired 1998]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 199#Wired magazine story and insistence by editors to follow apparent misrepresentation]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 200#Wired re: time travel]]
* [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 489#WIRED admitting to publishing stories without fact checking them, knowingly doesn't publish a retraction until outed months after the fact]]

* [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 4#Wired]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:Wired (magazine), Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Wired"
| ''[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]'' <small>(''[[Wired UK]]'')</small>
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 3#leaked documents?|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 79#Wired.com|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 103#wired.com and whosnews.usaweekend.com|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 109#Wired 1998|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 199#Wired magazine story and insistence by editors to follow apparent misrepresentation|5]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 200#Wired re: time travel|6]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 489#WIRED admitting to publishing stories without fact checking them, knowingly doesn't publish a retraction until outed months after the fact|7]]<br> [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 4#Wired|A]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2025}}
| ''Wired'' magazine is considered generally reliable for science and technology.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|wired.com|wired.co.uk}}
|}