{{Shortcut|WP:WND}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[WorldNetDaily]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label1 = other names
| data1 = WND
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Stop hand.svg|20px|Deprecated|link=]] '''Deprecated''': There is community consensus to [[WP:DEPS|deprecate]] the source.
}}
''WorldNetDaily'' was deprecated in the 2018 RfC. There is clear consensus that ''WorldNetDaily'' is not a reliable source, and that it should not be used because of its particularly poor reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. The website is known for promoting falsehoods and [[conspiracy theories]]. Most editors consider ''WorldNetDaily'' a [[WP:PARTISAN|partisan source]]. ''WorldNetDaily'''s [[WP:SYNDICATED|syndicated content]] should be evaluated by the reliability of its original publisher, and the citation should preferably point to the original publisher.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:WorldNetDaily, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-d" id="WorldNetDaily"
| ''[[WorldNetDaily]]'' (''WND'') {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:WND}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|d}}
| {{rsnl|253|RfC: WorldNetDaily|2018|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2018|stale=n}}
| ''WorldNetDaily'' was deprecated in the 2018 RfC. There is clear consensus that ''WorldNetDaily'' is not a reliable source, and that it should not be used because of its particularly poor reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. The website is known for promoting falsehoods and [[conspiracy theories]]. Most editors consider ''WorldNetDaily'' a [[WP:PARTISAN|partisan source]]. ''WorldNetDaily'''s [[WP:SYNDICATED|syndicated content]] should be evaluated by the reliability of its original publisher, and the citation should preferably point to the original publisher.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|wnd.com|worldnetdaily.com}}
|}